Tu español es perfecto. La condicion de violacion de ventana estereo esta dada por objetos que estan por delante (del punto donde el canal izquierdo y el canel derecho comparten el plano) y que les falte una porcion o todo un canal estereo. Si dibujas un triangulo entre tus ojos y los bordes de la foto todo lo que este por fuera de ese triangulo esta violando la ventana estereo. No se si la explicación es lo suficientemente entendible para ti en español, pero si no entiendes te la puedo escribir en ingles. Saludos,
La proxima vez escriebeme en Espanol, por favor! Mi Espanol no es estupendo pero de vez en cuando me gusta utilizarlo para convercerme que todavia me sirve para algo.
Acabo de leer tu "Note".
Cuando dices "window violation conditions", te refieres a que las imagenes no deberian sobresalir por los dos lados de la pantalla? Muchas gracias por este "tip". La verdad es que una otra persona me lo dijo tambien. Estoy tan acostumbrado a estas imagines 3D que simplemente no veo estas desventajas, pero me imagino que para muchas personal estas pueden destruir todo el efecto.
Como lo dije antes, de vez en cuando, para que no se vea los "ghosts", tengo que componer las dos imagines de esta menra. A ver si puedo evitar los window violation conditions la proxima vez.
Thanks so much, pzycho3000! I agree, it's a pity so few people have these glasses and thus can't appreciate 3D photography. The sad fact is that (with the exception to IMAX 3D films) stereoscopy is a dying art. Hopefully, there are such people as us who still remember about it. Enjoy!
Jkutianski, thank you so much for this unexpected flood of comments and tips. It's great to see that this gallery is getting increasingly popular. I know that some of the anaglyphs are a bit flawed but I guess I'm still learning. Unfortunately, probably there will be no new anaglyphs for the next 2 months as I temporarily don't have the camera... unless I dig out some old unused stereopairs! Keep checking, just in case.
Thanks, LittleBigDave. When I was creating this account I wasn't thinking about uploading so many of those anaglyphs, but such words each time encouraged to create some more. Great to see you are also into 3D. Your works are really good!
Your work is very inspiring! I discovered the joy of making anaglyphic images in 2006, and have made a few myself. Looking at your gallery has inspired me to pursue this interest even further!
Thank you for participating!
--
Fine, I won't push my religious beliefs on you, as long as you don't push your lack of them on me!
Good to see another person equipped with the glasses. I like it when people comment on the nice red and blue shades on my photos and how surreal it all looks, but I think I prefer when they have the glasses, can see the depth and enjoy the real essence of these anaglyphs. Thanks for your interest and kind words!
Hi, NaOki! I haven't heard about goewall, but read about it just a minute ago. Sounds interesting. I understand your frustration with those red and cyan colours. I am myself sometimes tired of them. I recently bought myself a stereoscope to finally explore my printed stereopairs in their full potential (how good to see those blue and red colours at last). Nevertheless, the anaglyph method remains the cheapest and most comfortable method to present my works online. As to the camera set-up I will have to disappoint you and say that I use none. I use only one camera (no tripod) and simply take 2-4 shots of a single object/scene from different angles as fast as I can (before things start moving). Of course, this technique requires some experience with the perspective and skill, as you have to predict how much you have to move without tilting the camera and spoiling the picture. Other then that, I try to stick to my own amateurish methods, but in the near future I plan to invest some $$ in new equipment. I am certainly in desperate need of a new (and better) camera.
Your gallery is brilliant! I didn't have enough time to go through all the images, but I'll definitely come back That's an amazing amount of work you've put into 440 anaglyphs! Simply wonderful...
great work and amazing gallery! I was curious if you know about "geowall" or how it works? I am building a geowall system now, because the red and blue of anaglyphs gives me a terrible headache after a while... also I was wondering if you mind sharing how you set up your camera(s)?
Hi Weegie, First of all thank you so much for spending your time on going through my gallery and making those comments. It's great to see new people somehow finding their way to my gallery, in spite of the fact that I haven't advertised it anyhow.
I checked your anaglyphs including the cello one. They are very accomplished, especially for a person who is a beginner. The cello even seems to be protruding from the screen. One advice. Did you use flash when taking the two pictures? The problem is there are some bright reflections on the cello's surface. When you moved to take the second picture the reflections shifted to the right. You can see that when looking through the glasses and closing one of your eyes then the other. But don't fret, some of my anaglyphs suffer from the same issue. Sometimes you can't avoid it when taking pictures of reflective surfaces.
Devious Comments
Tu español es perfecto.
La condicion de violacion de ventana estereo esta dada por objetos que estan por delante (del punto donde el canal izquierdo y el canel derecho comparten el plano) y que les falte una porcion o todo un canal estereo. Si dibujas un triangulo entre tus ojos y los bordes de la foto todo lo que este por fuera de ese triangulo esta violando la ventana estereo.
No se si la explicación es lo suficientemente entendible para ti en español, pero si no entiendes te la puedo escribir en ingles.
Saludos,
Juan Pablo
PD: prueba el Stereo Photo Maker [link]
La proxima vez escriebeme en Espanol, por favor!
Mi Espanol no es estupendo pero de vez en cuando me gusta utilizarlo para convercerme que todavia me sirve para algo.
Acabo de leer tu "Note".
Cuando dices "window violation conditions", te refieres a que las imagenes no deberian sobresalir por los dos lados de la pantalla?
Muchas gracias por este "tip". La verdad es que una otra persona me lo dijo tambien. Estoy tan acostumbrado a estas imagines 3D que simplemente no veo estas desventajas, pero me imagino que para muchas personal estas pueden destruir todo el efecto.
Como lo dije antes, de vez en cuando, para que no se vea los "ghosts", tengo que componer las dos imagines de esta menra. A ver si puedo evitar los window violation conditions la proxima vez.
cordialmente,
Sławek
thank you so much for this unexpected flood of comments and tips. It's great to see that this gallery is getting increasingly popular. I know that some of the anaglyphs are a bit flawed but I guess I'm still learning. Unfortunately, probably there will be no new anaglyphs for the next 2 months as I temporarily don't have the camera... unless I dig out some old unused stereopairs! Keep checking, just in case.
This stuff looks absolutely stunning with the glasses, it's a shame only those who own such glasses can see these amazing pieces!
I'm looking forward to seeing more! Great stuff!
--
(\_/)
('*.*'
(")(") This is my bunny, nya. Kill it, please. Or, alternatively, get a Felyne to do it. Cats like rabbits. I have experience.
Your = belonging to you. You're = you are. It's = It is. Its = belonging to it. GET IT RIGHT!
--
Fine, I won't push my religious beliefs on you, as long as you don't push your lack of them on me!
Great to see you are also into 3D. Your works are really good!
Thank you for participating!
--
Fine, I won't push my religious beliefs on you, as long as you don't push your lack of them on me!
Thanks for your interest and kind words!
Thanks for your motivating words. I hope you enjoy your next visit!
I understand your frustration with those red and cyan colours. I am myself sometimes tired of them. I recently bought myself a stereoscope to finally explore my printed stereopairs in their full potential (how good to see those blue and red colours at last). Nevertheless, the anaglyph method remains the cheapest and most comfortable method to present my works online.
As to the camera set-up I will have to disappoint you and say that I use none. I use only one camera (no tripod) and simply take 2-4 shots of a single object/scene from different angles as fast as I can (before things start moving). Of course, this technique requires some experience with the perspective and skill, as you have to predict how much you have to move without tilting the camera and spoiling the picture. Other then that, I try to stick to my own amateurish methods, but in the near future I plan to invest some $$ in new equipment. I am certainly in desperate need of a new (and better) camera.
Great idea, well executed.
Well done!
I'll run for my 3D glasses to start looking through it!
--
I am all that's left. Or maybe, I'm all that ever was. What about you? Do you remember your true name?
I was curious if you know about "geowall" or how it works? I am building a geowall system now, because the red and blue of anaglyphs gives me a terrible headache after a while... also I was wondering if you mind sharing how you set up your camera(s)?
First of all thank you so much for spending your time on going through my gallery and making those comments. It's great to see new people somehow finding their way to my gallery, in spite of the fact that I haven't advertised it anyhow.
I checked your anaglyphs including the cello one. They are very accomplished, especially for a person who is a beginner. The cello even seems to be protruding from the screen.
One advice. Did you use flash when taking the two pictures? The problem is there are some bright reflections on the cello's surface. When you moved to take the second picture the reflections shifted to the right. You can see that when looking through the glasses and closing one of your eyes then the other. But don't fret, some of my anaglyphs suffer from the same issue.
Previous Page123 Next Page